Epistemic Humility and the “FAKE” Domain

(The confidence of speaking to a category and calling the category a person)

There is a particular arrogance in that is easy to miss because it is dressed as care. It treats the group as the real person and the individual as a spare part, then speaks with total confidence about a domain called “Group Identity”: a cartoon drawn from a demographic tag before anyone has met the face.

That domain is fake. Not fake as in a polite fiction, fake as in a low-resolution rendering that keeps the category and throws the person away. Real people are strange and specific. They carry experiences, appetites, fears, and jokes that do not fit inside any line you can draw on a spreadsheet, and the line does not get truer because it is drawn with good intentions.

is the discipline of admitting you cannot know a person from the label on their file. It means walking into the conversation without a category in your mouth, and finding out what is actually in front of you. The category is not a person, and never was. A conversation cannot be honest when one side is addressing a phantom demographic instead of the human being standing there, waiting to be seen.

It is more work to talk to a person. You have to listen, revise, be wrong out loud, and give up the pleasant certainty of having them already sorted. That is the whole price. What you get for it is the only thing worth having: an actual relationship with someone who exists, instead of an argument with a row in a table.

Further reading: The Beacon Signal¹, You Were Given a World Before You Were Given Permission to Question It.²

The Beacon Signal. Their publication; credited and left in their words. ↩
You Were Given a World Before You Were Given Permission to Question It. A Beacon Signal essay, in their words. ↩

References